Why local trust matters for corporate reputation
Grassroots strategies seek to shift reputation-building from moments of crisis toward sustained relationships with communities, local leaders and stakeholders.
The perception that one’s own voice counts is closely related to levels of trust. An OECD survey on the determinants of trust in Latin America and the Caribbean found that 66% of people who feel that people like them have a voice in decision-making trust the national government, compared with 21% among those who feel they do not.
Although the study analyzes public institutions rather than brands, the data points to a principle applicable to organizations seeking legitimacy: feeling heard is related to trust in those making decisions.
Social legitimacy goes beyond stakeholders.
Grassroots strategies build on this logic to establish relationships within communities before there is a corporate need. The approach seeks to identify who has legitimacy in a community, understand what concerns its residents and create spaces for participation that can translate into concrete actions.
In practice, a grassroots strategy seeks to move from reactive communication to sustained relationships with communities, based on listening, participation and anticipation.
1) Map trust, not just stakeholders
Identifying authorities, organizations and stakeholder groups is only the beginning. The real map should reveal whom the community listens to when it needs to form an opinion.
That influence may be found in a neighborhood association, a community leader, a civil society organization, a specialist, a local business or even someone without a formal position who has built credibility over years.
Available evidence on communities also points to the importance of looking at the local level. A Trust for Civic Life survey, conducted together with the SNF Agora Institute at Johns Hopkins University among 584 leaders and residents of eight rural communities in the United States, found higher levels of trust in local institutions such as schools, churches and community businesses than in national institutions.
The analysis also shows that the particular context of each community influences who is considered trustworthy. The point is to distinguish between formal power and social legitimacy.
Listening must come before communication.
2) Listen before having something to say
A grassroots strategy should not begin with a corporate message. First, it needs to understand what conversations are already taking place.
Listening makes it possible to detect concerns, expectations, cultural codes and potential points of friction that are unlikely to appear in a national report or media monitoring. It also helps identify the gap between a company’s priorities and what actually matters in the community.
For Guido Gaona, Chief of Corporate Communications LATAM at another, waiting until there is a corporate need changes the nature of that relationship from the outset:
Guido Gaona: “The worst time to introduce yourself to a community is when you need something from it. If the first contact occurs during a crisis, a sensitive expansion or a conflict, the relationship has already been shaped by urgency. Companies that understand long-term reputation build dialogue while there is still no agenda to defend. That is where trust stops being a message and becomes an asset”.
3) Turn participation into capacity for action
Listening is essential, but not enough. Opening spaces for dialogue without demonstrating what happened afterward can produce the opposite effect to the one intended.
Research by Trust for Civic Life found that acting alongside other community members was closely related to greater feelings of trust and belonging; dialogue alone showed little correlation with those same variables.
For an organization, this means creating mechanisms through which participation can produce visible consequences: modifying an initiative, solving a shared problem, collaborating with local actors or transparently explaining why a request cannot be implemented.
Participation gains credibility when people can recognize what changed as a result of it.
Local listening also makes it possible to anticipate tensions.
4) Turn local listening into the capacity to anticipate
Grassroots loses some of its value when it is activated solely as a tool for containment.
A network of local relationships built consistently can provide context before decisions are made, early signals of discontent and an understanding of the community that traditional indicators do not always capture. In this way, relationships with communities also serve as a source of information to anticipate tensions.
Guido Gaona, an expert in crisis management, believes this is one of the greatest opportunities for companies:
Guido Gaona: “Grassroots should not be understood as communication from the bottom up or as a network of local spokespeople. When properly built, it works as an early warning system: it makes it possible to identify tensions that have not yet reached the media, understand which actors have legitimacy and correct decisions before a disagreement becomes a crisis. Listening early not only protects reputation; it improves business decisions”.
Building legitimacy within communities requires continuity. The goal is not to manufacture allies who automatically defend an organization, but to establish relationships strong enough to maintain dialogue even when disagreements exist.
Large campaigns can generate reach in weeks, but legitimacy depends on sustained relationships that survive the campaign.
|
|
